Since I heard the first time about AMTSO (Anti Malware Testing Standards Organization), in one of the VB Conferences (I think two years ago), I asked myself whether or not this association makes sense. I’ve heard later on that Avira is also part of it.
But, I simply forgot about this issue.
I recently started to hear a lot of noise about this issue, saying that AMTSO represents only the interests of the AV Industry and not those of the user getting infected.
I don’t have yet an opinion, but as soon as I have one, I’ll post it 😉
Here are links with PROs and CONs arguments:
PROs:
- Joint Blog By amtso
http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2010/07/07/testing-and-accountability/
http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Protection-Blog/Testing-and-Accountability/ba-p/247711
http://www.securelist.com/en/blog?weblogid=2224
http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/testing-and-accountability/
http://www.eset.com/blog/2010/07/07/testing-and-accountability
A related blog was published on the AVIEN blog
CONs:
- The AMTSO Melee
Anti Malware Testing Standards Organization: a dissenting view
AMTSO: a serious attempt to clean up anti-malware testing; or just a great big con?
(please read the discussion thread there !!!)
© Copyright 2010 Sorin Mustaca, All rights Reserved. Written For: Sorin Mustaca on Cybersecurity
Check www.endpoint-cybersecurity.com for seeing the consulting services we offer.
Visit www.itsecuritynews.info for latest security news in English
Besuchen Sie de.itsecuritynews.info für IT Sicherheits News auf Deutsch
One thought on “The AMTSO debate”
Comments are closed.